Recommendations for effectively integrating licit into your AI-assisted development workflow.
Initial Setup
1. Initialize from the beginning
Run licit init at the start of the project, not later. The sooner you start tracking, the more complete the compliance evidence will be.
mkdir my-project && cd my-project
git init
# ... initial setup ...
licit init
git add .licit.yaml
git commit -m "feat: initialize licit compliance tracking"
2. Commit .licit.yaml
The configuration file should be version-controlled. The entire team should use the same configuration.
git add .licit.yaml
3. Configure .gitignore correctly
# Sensitive licit data
.licit/provenance.jsonl
.licit/fria-data.json
# Signing key
.licit/signing-key
# Generated reports (optional — can be included)
# .licit/reports/
4. Select relevant frameworks
Do not enable frameworks that do not apply to your context:
# If your product does not operate in the EU:
frameworks:
eu_ai_act: false
owasp_agentic: true
# If you only need EU AI Act:
frameworks:
eu_ai_act: true
owasp_agentic: false
Provenance Traceability
5. Run trace regularly
Run licit trace after each sprint or release to keep traceability up to date:
licit trace --since 2026-03-01 --stats --report
Combine git heuristics with session logs for greater accuracy:
provenance:
methods:
- git-infer
- session-log
session_dirs:
- ~/.claude/projects/
6. Enable signing in regulated environments
If you need to demonstrate integrity of the provenance chain:
provenance:
sign: true
sign_key_path: ~/.licit/signing-key
Generate a secure key:
python3.12 -c "import secrets; print(secrets.token_hex(32))" > ~/.licit/signing-key
chmod 600 ~/.licit/signing-key
7. Adjust the confidence threshold
The default (0.6) is conservative. Adjust according to your context:
provenance:
# Stricter (fewer AI false positives)
confidence_threshold: 0.8
# More permissive (detects more AI code, more false positives)
confidence_threshold: 0.4
AI Agent Configuration
8. Document your agents
Maintain explicit agent configuration files:
CLAUDE.md # Instructions for Claude Code
.cursorrules # Rules for Cursor
AGENTS.md # GitHub Agents configuration
licit automatically monitors these files and records changes.
9. Implement guardrails
In your architect or other agent configuration, define:
- Protected files: Files the agent should not modify.
- Blocked commands: Commands the agent should not execute.
- Code rules: Mandatory patterns or practices.
# .architect/config.yaml (example)
guardrails:
protected_files:
- .env
- secrets.yaml
- migrations/
blocked_commands:
- rm -rf
- DROP TABLE
code_rules:
- "no eval() or exec()"
- "all API endpoints require authentication"
licit counts these guardrails as compliance evidence.
10. Require human review in CI/CD
Configure your pipeline to require human approval before deployment:
# .github/workflows/deploy.yml
jobs:
deploy:
environment: production # Requires approval in GitHub
steps:
- name: Compliance check
run: licit verify
- name: Deploy
run: ./deploy.sh
licit detects the presence of environment: in GitHub Actions as evidence of a human review gate.
Continuous Compliance
11. Integrate licit verify into CI/CD
Add a compliance check to every PR:
# .github/workflows/compliance.yml
name: Compliance
on: [pull_request]
jobs:
check:
runs-on: ubuntu-latest
steps:
- uses: actions/checkout@v4
with:
fetch-depth: 0
- uses: actions/setup-python@v5
with:
python-version: "3.12"
- run: pip install licit-ai-cli
- run: licit verify
12. Generate agent config changelogs
Run licit changelog regularly to document changes in your AI agent configuration. This is key evidence for compliance:
licit changelog # Markdown by default
licit changelog --format json # JSON for integration
licit changelog --since 2026-03-01 # From a specific date
The changelog classifies each change as MAJOR (model/provider), MINOR (prompt/guardrails/tools), or PATCH (tweaks). MAJOR changes deserve special attention — they can affect agent behavior.
git add .licit/changelog.md
git commit -m "docs: update agent config changelog"
13. Generate reports periodically
Do not wait until the audit. Generate reports with each release:
# Before each release
licit trace --report
licit changelog
licit report --format markdown
git add .licit/reports/ .licit/changelog.md
git commit -m "docs: update compliance report for v1.2.0"
14. Review gaps regularly
licit gaps
Prioritize closing the highest-priority gaps first.
Connectors
15. Enable connectors when possible
If you use Architect or Vigil, enable them. They provide additional evidence:
licit connect architect
licit connect vigil
Architect provides:
- Execution audit trail
- Guardrails configuration
- Quality gates
Vigil provides:
- Security findings (SARIF)
- SBOM (Software Bill of Materials)
16. Integrate security tools
licit automatically detects these tools and uses their results as evidence:
| Tool | What it detects |
|---|---|
| Semgrep | Insecure code patterns |
| Snyk | Dependency vulnerabilities |
| CodeQL | Static security analysis |
| Trivy | Container vulnerabilities |
| ESLint Security | JavaScript security rules |
Team Organization
17. Designate a compliance lead
Someone on the team should be responsible for:
- Reviewing licit reports periodically.
- Ensuring gaps are prioritized and closed.
- Keeping the FRIA up to date.
- Coordinating with legal/compliance if necessary.
18. Document decisions
When a requirement is marked as n/a (not applicable), document why. This is important for audits:
# In your FRIA or internal documentation:
Art. 10 (Data Governance): N/A — This system does not train models,
it only uses pre-trained models via API.
19. Keep the configuration up to date
When you switch AI tools, update the configuration:
# After migrating from Cursor to Claude Code
licit init # Re-detect the project
licit status # Verify the detection
Anti-patterns to Avoid
| Anti-pattern | Why it is problematic | What to do instead |
|---|---|---|
Ignoring licit verify warnings | Partial compliance issues accumulate | Treat partial compliance as technical debt |
Not versioning .licit.yaml | Each dev uses a different config | Commit to the repo |
Pushing provenance.jsonl to a public repo | Exposes contributor info | Add to .gitignore |
| Generating reports only before audits | Incomplete evidence | Generate with each release |
| Disabling signing “because it’s slow” | Loss of verifiable integrity | Sign at least in CI |
| Not updating the FRIA | An outdated FRIA has no value | Update with each significant change |
Marking everything as n/a | Compliance evasion | Justify each n/a in writing |